What's the Difference Between an Acquittal and a "Not Guilty" Verdict?

Nolo was born in 1971 as a publisher of self-help legal books. Guided by the motto “law for all,” our attorney authors and editors have been explaining the law to everyday people ever since. Learn more about our history and our editorial standards.

Each article that we publish has been written or reviewed by one of our editors, who together have over 100 years of experience practicing law. We strive to keep our information current as laws change. Learn more about our editorial standards.

A verdict of not guilty constitutes an acquittal. In other words, to find a defendant not guilty is to acquit. At trial, an acquittal occurs when the jury (or the judge if it's a judge trial) determines that the prosecution hasn't proved the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. (But see Jury Nullification.) A jury can find a defendant not guilty of some, but not all charges. In that scenario, the acquittal is only partial. A not-guilty verdict isn't the only way for an acquittal to come about. Trial judges and appeals courts can, for example, effectively acquit defendants by finding that there was insufficient evidence of guilt. While there's no way for the prosecution to appeal a verdict of not guilty, there is sometimes an opportunity to appeal a court's judgment of acquittal. (For example, see Acquittals by Judges in Jury Trials.)